<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Protein annotation as term categorization in the gene ontology using word proximity networks"</p><p></p><p>BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6(Suppl 1):S20-S20.</p><p>Published online 24 May 2005</p><p>PMCID:PMC1869013.</p><p></p> Note that recall is bounded above by precision, due to the need to cut off the number of GOC cluster heads considered based on the number of requested results. The x axis indicates the value of specificity (); the y axis represents the value of precision or recall, as a percentage
<p>In this table we present a more detailed view of performance for our method's poorest predicted n...
<p>Performance of the hypergeometric probabilistic score is shown for gene functional associations i...
(A) Thresholding clusters by the number of annotations in the cluster improved precision by 17% whil...
<p>(A) Frequency histograms of the usage of 1,067 Gene Ontology “biological process” annotations, ra...
Precision/recall curves in red are associated with the gap method, and the point marked with a circl...
Proportion of Gene Ontology (GO) terms per evaluation category with a precision/recall performance p...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evaluation of high-throughput functional categori...
<p>A) Average precision as exceptional edges are added, B) Network performance is predicted by overl...
<p>For each year from 2005 to 2013 denoted on the x-axis, the corresponding dataset includes those g...
<p>Two-fold cross-validation was carried out to ensure that enough examples are included in both the...
<p>The boxplots show the relative improvement of the area under the receiver operating characteristi...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Data-poor categorization and passage retrieval fo...
<p>Gene pair correlations derived from each similarity measure were benchmarked against a Gene Ontol...
<p>Precision and recalls for the benchmarking of the reaction-to-gene association score.</p
Se different sets of patterns, different gene annotations may be obtained. This figure shows the rec...
<p>In this table we present a more detailed view of performance for our method's poorest predicted n...
<p>Performance of the hypergeometric probabilistic score is shown for gene functional associations i...
(A) Thresholding clusters by the number of annotations in the cluster improved precision by 17% whil...
<p>(A) Frequency histograms of the usage of 1,067 Gene Ontology “biological process” annotations, ra...
Precision/recall curves in red are associated with the gap method, and the point marked with a circl...
Proportion of Gene Ontology (GO) terms per evaluation category with a precision/recall performance p...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evaluation of high-throughput functional categori...
<p>A) Average precision as exceptional edges are added, B) Network performance is predicted by overl...
<p>For each year from 2005 to 2013 denoted on the x-axis, the corresponding dataset includes those g...
<p>Two-fold cross-validation was carried out to ensure that enough examples are included in both the...
<p>The boxplots show the relative improvement of the area under the receiver operating characteristi...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Data-poor categorization and passage retrieval fo...
<p>Gene pair correlations derived from each similarity measure were benchmarked against a Gene Ontol...
<p>Precision and recalls for the benchmarking of the reaction-to-gene association score.</p
Se different sets of patterns, different gene annotations may be obtained. This figure shows the rec...
<p>In this table we present a more detailed view of performance for our method's poorest predicted n...
<p>Performance of the hypergeometric probabilistic score is shown for gene functional associations i...
(A) Thresholding clusters by the number of annotations in the cluster improved precision by 17% whil...